P. C. Schmidt

1.6k citations
43 papers · 952 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

P. C. Schmidt

41 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

P. C. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 564
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 182
  • Radiation 110
  • Spectroscopy 144
  • Condensed Matter Physics 78
Replace H. Langhoff with:
H. Langhoff Germany
Earl F. Worden United States
Jeffrey A. Zimmerman United States
Romuald Zalubas United States
Κ. Eberhardt Germany
Mark Fred United States
H. Kunieda Japan
Ian A. McLure United Kingdom
E. Rachlew Sweden
J. R. Hiskes United States
P. C. Schmidt relative to H. Langhoff Germany H. Langhoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
H. Langhoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. C. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. C. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. C. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. C. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. C. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. C. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. C. Schmidt. The network helps show where P. C. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. C. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. C. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together P. C. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978334
2 198776
3 197359
4 200359
5 197559
6 200446
7 199136
8 198635
9 200124
10 200120
11 198019
12 198019
13 197316
14 200715
15 199615
16 200214
17 19969
18 19858
19 20017
20 19937

About P. C. Schmidt

P. C. Schmidt is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 43 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (564 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (182 citations), Radiation (110 citations), Spectroscopy (144 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (78 citations). P. C. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include P. Eisenberger, T. P. Das, P. M. Platzman, L. D. Clements, G. Bollen, F. Ames, O. Forstner, G. Huber, K. C. Mishra and K. Blaum. Their work appears in journals such as Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, AIChE Journal, Nuclear Physics A, Drying Technology and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact