Oren Soffer

625 citations
33 papers · 366 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Oren Soffer

27 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Oren Soffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Communication 171
  • Human-Computer Interaction 72
  • Linguistics and Language 25
  • Literature and Literary Theory 59
  • Sociology and Political Science 153
Replace Arthur D. Santana with:
Arthur D. Santana United States
Penelope Sheets Netherlands
Antonio García Gómez Spain
Adam Hodges United States
Amanda Potts United Kingdom
Tom Van Hout Netherlands
Hans-Jürgen Bucher Germany
Alecea Standlee United States
Werner Holly Germany
Rita Raley United States
Oren Soffer relative to Arthur D. Santana United States Arthur D. Santana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Arthur D. Santana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oren Soffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oren Soffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oren Soffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oren Soffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oren Soffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oren Soffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oren Soffer. The network helps show where Oren Soffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Oren Soffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oren Soffer Line = papers co-authored together Oren Soffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201058
2 201947
3 200944
4 201229
5 201329
6 201627
7 201723
8 201822
9 200812
10 201912
11 201210
12 20177
13 20107
14 20045
15 20204
16 20204
17 20044
18 20173
19 20053
20 20143

About Oren Soffer

Oren Soffer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (13 papers), Media Studies and Communication (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (9 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (5 papers), Digital Communication and Language (4 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (171 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (72 citations), Linguistics and Language (25 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (59 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (153 citations). Oren Soffer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Ireland and China. Frequent co-authors include Anat Ben-David, Yoram Eshet‐Alkalai, Vered Silber‐Varod and Tamar Liebes. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Theory, Journalism, Jewish Social Studies, Israel Affairs and Journalism Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact