Norbert Löw

463 citations
11 papers · 415 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Norbert Löw

11 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Norbert Löw
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Inorganic Chemistry 251
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 273
  • Organic Chemistry 236
  • Spectroscopy 66
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 32
Replace Eric Siebel with:
Eric Siebel Germany
Chung‐Chou Lee Taiwan
Annabel D. Cutland United States
C.-A. Carraz United Kingdom
Hua‐Bin Wu China
Hansruedi Mürner Switzerland
Jeffrey J. Bodwin United States
E. Uller Germany
V.D. Vreshch United States
Jean-Marc Bénech Switzerland
Norbert Löw relative to Eric Siebel Germany Eric Siebel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Eric Siebel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Löw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Löw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Löw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Löw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Löw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Löw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Löw. The network helps show where Norbert Löw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Norbert Löw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Norbert Löw Line = papers co-authored together Norbert Löw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199874
2 199572
3 199861
4 199860
5 199657
6 199530
7 199828
8 199627
9 20013
10 19982
11 19981

About Norbert Löw

Norbert Löw is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology and Catalysis, having authored 11 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (3 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers) and Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (251 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (273 citations), Organic Chemistry (236 citations), Spectroscopy (66 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (32 citations). Norbert Löw has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rolf W. Saalfrank, Frank Hampel, Dietmar Stalke, M. Teichert, Hans‐Dietrich Stachel, Sabine Kareth, Bernhard Demleitner, George M. Sheldrick, Karl Peters and Hans Georg̀ von Schnering. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemistry - A European Journal, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English and Angewandte Chemie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact