Niraj Naswa

39 papers receiving 880 citations

Peers

Niraj Naswa
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Neurology 224
  • Epidemiology 419
  • Oncology 281
  • Internal Medicine 27
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106
Replace Anil Gopinathan with:
Anil Gopinathan Singapore
M.L. Rosado de Christenson United States
Antonı́n Krajina Czechia
Giorgio F. Coloni Italy
William P. Shutze United States
Malak Itani United States
Franco Uggeri Italy
M Caudry France
C. Metreweli China
R Giudicelli France
Niraj Naswa relative to Anil Gopinathan Singapore Anil Gopinathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Anil Gopinathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Niraj Naswa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Niraj Naswa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niraj Naswa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niraj Naswa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Niraj Naswa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niraj Naswa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niraj Naswa. The network helps show where Niraj Naswa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Niraj Naswa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Niraj Naswa Line = papers co-authored together Niraj Naswa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011102
2 201268
3 201357
4 201157
5 201355
6 201154
7 201146
8 201440
9 201439
10 201538
11 201236
12 201226
13 201225
14 201221
15 201321
16 201520
17 201117
18 201117
19 201316
20 201315

About Niraj Naswa

Niraj Naswa is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Oncology, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 888 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (18 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (7 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (7 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (5 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (224 citations), Epidemiology (419 citations), Oncology (281 citations), Internal Medicine (27 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106 citations). Niraj Naswa has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Punit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Arun Malhotra, Sellam Karunanithi, Ariachery C. Ammini, Abhishek Kumar, Brusabhanu Nayak, Rakesh Kumar and P.N. Dogra. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, Nuclear Medicine Communications, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, European Radiology and Clinical Nuclear Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact