Nima Dehmamy

9 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Nima Dehmamy
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 55
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 21
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 16
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 21
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 17
Replace Rui Xiao with:
Rui Xiao China
Benjamin M. Schmidt Germany
Fabio Del Prete France
Scott Emmons United States
Erica Briscoe United States
Homa Hosseinmardi United States
Maja Rudolph United States
Armando López‐Cuevas Mexico
John Tang United Kingdom
Steven Spielberg Canada
Nima Dehmamy relative to Rui Xiao China Rui Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Rui Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nima Dehmamy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nima Dehmamy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nima Dehmamy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nima Dehmamy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nima Dehmamy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nima Dehmamy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nima Dehmamy. The network helps show where Nima Dehmamy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Nima Dehmamy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nima Dehmamy Line = papers co-authored together Nima Dehmamy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201857
2 202147
3 202026
4
Understanding the Representation Power of Graph Neural Networks in Learning Graph Topology
201914
5 202310
6
A Systemic Stress Test Model in Bank-Asset Networks
20147
7 20217
8
Modelling Axon Growth Using Driven Diffusion
20191
9 20191
10 20250
11 20250
12 20240

About Nima Dehmamy

Nima Dehmamy is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Finance, having authored 12 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (1 paper), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (55 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (16 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (21 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (17 citations). Nima Dehmamy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Albert-László Barabási, Dashun Wang, C. Lee Giles, Rose Yu, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Irena Vodenska, H. Eugene Stanley, Shlomo Havlin, Shlomo Havlin and Daniel Haehn. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Physics, Nature, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery and ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact