Nicholas Cheney

21 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

Nicholas Cheney
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Modeling and Simulation 12
  • Artificial Intelligence 65
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 18
  • Mechanical Engineering 57
Replace Om Prakash Singh with:
Om Prakash Singh Malaysia
Heting Zhang China
Vito Gentile Italy
Joana Morgado Portugal
Justinas Mišeikis Norway
Arsen Abdulali United Kingdom
Dengying Liu China
Bruce Roberts United States
Denise Hebesberger Austria
Nicholas Cheney relative to Om Prakash Singh Malaysia Om Prakash Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Om Prakash Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Cheney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Cheney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Cheney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Cheney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Cheney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Cheney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Cheney. The network helps show where Nicholas Cheney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Cheney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Cheney Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Cheney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201427
2 201625
3 201623
4 201422
5 202018
6 201917
7 202013
8 202211
9 202110
10 201410
11 20219
12 20216
13 20215
14 20224
15 20173
16 20182
17 20241
18 20211
19 20201
20 20181

About Nicholas Cheney

Nicholas Cheney is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Agronomy and Crop Science, Mechanical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 22 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (4 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (3 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (2 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (9 citations), Modeling and Simulation (12 citations), Artificial Intelligence (65 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (18 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (57 citations). Nicholas Cheney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sierra Leone. Frequent co-authors include Hod Lipson, Jeff Clune, Josh Bongard, Vytas SunSpiral, Reed D. Gurchiek, Ryan S. McGinnis, Trisha Shrum, Scott C. Merrill, Asim Zia and Julia M. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Patient Education and Counseling, The Lancet Planetary Health, Histochemistry and Cell Biology and Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact