N.F.G. Beck

997 citations
44 papers · 842 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 29
    • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 4
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 18

N.F.G. Beck

44 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers

N.F.G. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 520
  • Animal Science and Zoology 145
  • Genetics 357
  • Reproductive Medicine 79
  • Small Animals 71
Replace D.E. Grum with:
D.E. Grum United States
J. G. Manns Canada
M. C. Lucy United States
W. D. Oxender United States
M. Saeb Iran
J. Z. Kendall United States
M. A. Lomax United Kingdom
T. Atkinson United Kingdom
T.A.M. Kruip Netherlands
P. G. Weston United States
N.F.G. Beck relative to D.E. Grum United States D.E. Grum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D.E. Grum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.F.G. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.F.G. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.F.G. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.F.G. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.F.G. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.F.G. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.F.G. Beck. The network helps show where N.F.G. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.F.G. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.F.G. Beck Line = papers co-authored together N.F.G. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197998
2 200478
3 200655
4 200344
5 197342
6 200037
7 199832
8 198532
9 199428
10 197927
11 199625
12 199325
13 197724
14 199323
15 197923
16 199622
17 199220
18 199619
19 199118
20 200918

About N.F.G. Beck

N.F.G. Beck is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Small Animals, having authored 44 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (29 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (18 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (7 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (520 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (145 citations), Genetics (357 citations), Reproductive Medicine (79 citations) and Small Animals (71 citations). N.F.G. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include M. Khalid, R.J. Dewhurst, Bruce Davies, T. B. Mepham, A.R. Peters, K. C. Lowe, Peter W. Nathanielsz, H. A. Tucker, C.A.M. Jansen and Rodney Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Science, Animal Reproduction Science, Journal of Dairy Science, Experimental Biology and Medicine and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact