N.F. Peek

679 citations
28 papers · 546 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N.F. Peek

28 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

N.F. Peek
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Radiation 156
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 81
  • Biochemistry 36
  • Animal Science and Zoology 51
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 96
Replace Roland Bramlet with:
Roland Bramlet United States
Wright H. Langham United States
J. Katz United States
Ken‐ichi Tamura Japan
Yutaka Furuta Japan
L.A. Braby United States
Robert Wielgosz France
Carlos G. Bell
Asher Finkel United States
R.F. Coleman United Kingdom
N.F. Peek relative to Roland Bramlet United States Roland Bramlet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Roland Bramlet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.F. Peek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.F. Peek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.F. Peek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.F. Peek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.F. Peek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.F. Peek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.F. Peek. The network helps show where N.F. Peek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.F. Peek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.F. Peek Line = papers co-authored together N.F. Peek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197758
2 195253
3 197851
4 198150
5 195449
6 195347
7 196531
8
Production of carrier-free 123 I using the 127 I(p,5n) 123 Xe reaction.
197229
9 197624
10 196423
11 196216
12 198114
13 197714
14 195414
15 197513
16 197210
17 19969
18 19728
19 19796
20 19625

About N.F. Peek

N.F. Peek is a scholar working on Radiation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (156 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (81 citations), Biochemistry (36 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (51 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (96 citations). N.F. Peek has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include D.W. Peterson, J.A. Jungerman, Elie A. Shneour, Norris J. Parks, C. R. Grau, Manuel C. Lagunas-Solar, Elliot Goldstein, Carolynn Patten, Horace H. Hines and F.P. Brady. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Medical Physics, Science, British Journal of Radiology and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact