Neil Wright

1.5k citations
59 papers · 994 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Wright

55 papers receiving 954 citations

Peers

Neil Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 392
  • Nephrology 91
  • Pharmacy 59
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 194
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 248
Replace Mary Pierce with:
Mary Pierce United Kingdom
Crystal C. Tyson United States
Elke Lehmkuhl Germany
Maria de Fátima Haueisen Sander Diniz Brazil
Marco Giussani Italy
Hairong Nan Hong Kong
Valeria Hirschler Argentina
J C Konen United States
Hirotaka Ochiai Japan
Lisa K. Volkening United States
Neil Wright relative to Mary Pierce United Kingdom Mary Pierce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mary Pierce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Wright. The network helps show where Neil Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Wright Line = papers co-authored together Neil Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000171
2 2006124
3 201290
4 202238
5 201338
6
Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.
199337
7 201135
8 202032
9 200830
10 200624
11 201824
12 200222
13 200719
14 201618
15 202417
16 200817
17 201717
18 201716
19 201616
20 201616

About Neil Wright

Neil Wright is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (13 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (9 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (8 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (6 papers) and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (392 citations), Nephrology (91 citations), Pharmacy (59 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (194 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (248 citations). Neil Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J K Wales, Robert Copeland, Amanda Daley, Andrea Roalfe, Stuart A. Ross, André Bélanger, J.E. Marion, Chantal Godin, Jean‐Pierre Hallé and Talat Mushtaq. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Disease in Childhood, Clinical Endocrinology, European Journal of Endocrinology, BMJ Paediatrics Open and Diabetic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact