Neev Khera
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 8
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 5
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 4
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 6
- Co-authors
- Abhay Ashtekar (6 shared papers)Nils Deppe (5 shared papers)Michael Boyle (5 shared papers)Mark Scheel (5 shared papers)Harald Pfeiffer (5 shared papers)Saul A. Teukolsky (5 shared papers)Keefe Mitman (4 shared papers)Jordan Moxon (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (9 papers)Journal of High Energy Physics (3 papers)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Neev Khera
14 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 231
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 124
- Geophysics 36
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 27
- Oceanography 22
Countries citing papers authored by Neev Khera
This map shows the geographic impact of Neev Khera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neev Khera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neev Khera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neev Khera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neev Khera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neev Khera. The network helps show where Neev Khera may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neev Khera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 |
About Neev Khera
Neev Khera is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Oceanography and Geophysics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (2 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (231 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (124 citations), Geophysics (36 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (27 citations) and Oceanography (22 citations). Neev Khera has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Abhay Ashtekar, Nils Deppe, Michael Boyle, Mark Scheel, Harald Pfeiffer, Saul A. Teukolsky, Keefe Mitman, Jordan Moxon, William Throwe and Larry Kidder. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical Review Letters and Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.