Nathan Weiler

79 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Nathan Weiler
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 272
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 709
  • Emergency Medicine 188
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 85
  • Spectroscopy 210
Replace Maurizio F. Cereda with:
Maurizio F. Cereda United States
Norbert Weiler Germany
Gunnar Elke Germany
C. Jacquot France
Muneyuki Takeuchi Japan
Giovanni Vento Italy
Charles Wira United States
Peyman Benharash United States
Andreas Weyland Germany
Edda Tschernko Austria
Nathan Weiler relative to Maurizio F. Cereda United States Maurizio F. Cereda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Maurizio F. Cereda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Weiler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Weiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Weiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Weiler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Weiler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Weiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Weiler. The network helps show where Nathan Weiler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Weiler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Weiler Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Weiler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999162
2 2019121
3 2010112
4 1994104
5 199997
6 200179
7 200773
8 201072
9 201668
10 201667
11 201354
12 200052
13 201949
14 201342
15 200740
16 201339
17 200339
18 200637
19 201436
20 200535

About Nathan Weiler

Nathan Weiler is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (25 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (14 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (14 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (272 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (709 citations), Emergency Medicine (188 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (85 citations) and Spectroscopy (210 citations). Nathan Weiler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Inez Frerichs, Dirk Schädler, Balthasar Eberle, Klaus Markstaller, Tobias Becher, MANFRED THELEN, Wolfgang Heinrichs, Barbara Vogt, Jens Scholz and H.‐U. Kauczor. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Measurement, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Intensive Care Medicine, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact