Nathan Satchell

518 citations
24 papers · 405 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Satchell

23 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Nathan Satchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Condensed Matter Physics 323
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 192
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 24
  • Mechanics of Materials 18
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 10
Replace Anna Malmros with:
Anna Malmros Sweden
Mehran Matloubian United States
R. Ishiguro Japan
M. Giura Italy
M.J. Delaney United States
Nobumitsu Hirose Japan
H. G. Lukefahr United States
Yuki I. Hamada Japan
A. І. Gubin Ukraine
Chuntai Shi United States
Nathan Satchell relative to Anna Malmros Sweden Anna Malmros's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Anna Malmros · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Satchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Satchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Satchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Satchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Satchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Satchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Satchell. The network helps show where Nathan Satchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Satchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Satchell Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Satchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201561
2 201555
3 201845
4 201835
5 202430
6 202324
7 201920
8 202018
9 201916
10 201916
11 201711
12 201710
13 202310
14 202410
15 20209
16 20158
17 20217
18 20165
19 20165
20 20175

About Nathan Satchell

Nathan Satchell is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (20 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (1 paper), Quantum Information and Cryptography (1 paper) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (323 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (192 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (24 citations), Mechanics of Materials (18 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (10 citations). Nathan Satchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Norman O. Birge, Gavin Burnell, M. G. Flokstra, Stephen Lee, Sean Langridge, Peter J. Curran, Simon John Bending, Thomas Prokscha, Christian J. Kinane and Jang‐Yong Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Physical review. B., Applied Physics Letters, Superconductor Science and Technology and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact