Nathan Long

2.6k citations
80 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Long

77 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Nathan Long
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.1k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 791
  • Animal Science and Zoology 252
  • Small Animals 114
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 117
Replace Susana Astiz with:
Susana Astiz Spain
Gary E. Moss United States
Caleb Owens Lemley United States
K. A. Vonnahme United States
David O. Kleemann Australia
Allison M Meyer United States
Justin S. Luther United States
Raymond P. Aitken United Kingdom
Tammi L L Neville United States
Laura Torres-Rovira Spain
Nathan Long relative to Susana Astiz Spain Susana Astiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Susana Astiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Long

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Long more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Long

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Long. The network helps show where Nathan Long may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Long, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Long Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Long links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010149
2 2010117
3 2009107
4 2011100
5 201291
6 201082
7 201177
8 201073
9 201173
10 201170
11 201065
12 201463
13 201062
14 201361
15 201258
16 201255
17 201451
18 201044
19 201644
20 201543

About Nathan Long

Nathan Long is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (36 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (32 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (20 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (6 papers), Animal health and immunology (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers) and Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.1k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (791 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (252 citations), Small Animals (114 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (117 citations). Nathan Long has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Uruguay. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Ford, Peter W. Nathanielsz, Adam B. Uthlaut, ‬Min Du, Derek T. Smith, Yan Ma, Lindsey A. George, R. P. Wettemann, Mark J. Nijland and B. W. Hess. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology, Domestic Animal Endocrinology, Animals and Journal of Dairy Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact