Nathan D. Powers

30 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Nathan D. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 655
  • Radiation 267
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 813
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 280
  • Mechanics of Materials 286
Replace Eric C. Landahl with:
Eric C. Landahl United States
Tadashi Nishikawa Japan
A. Naber Germany
José Antonio Pérez-Hernández Spain
Flavio Zamponi Germany
Vladimir Popov Russia
M. Nicoul Germany
O. Albert France
Jui‐Teng Lin United States
Xing-Long Zhu China
Nathan D. Powers relative to Eric C. Landahl United States Eric C. Landahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Eric C. Landahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan D. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan D. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan D. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan D. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan D. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan D. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan D. Powers. The network helps show where Nathan D. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan D. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan D. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Nathan D. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013262
2 2013216
3 2002173
4 200391
5 200283
6 200870
7 200867
8 200458
9 201544
10 201241
11 201338
12 201025
13 200625
14 201323
15 201522
16 201321
17 201617
18 200713
19 200212
20 20183

About Nathan D. Powers

Nathan D. Powers is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Geophysics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers) and Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (655 citations), Radiation (267 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (813 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (280 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (286 citations). Nathan D. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ming Yan, Donald P. Umstadter, D. J. Sellmyer, Grigory Golovin, Hao Zeng, Shenjin Chen, Sudeep Banerjee, Isaac Ghebregziabher, Cheng Liu and J. Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams, Cancer Research, Physics of Plasmas and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact