Nathan Better

1.5k citations
39 papers · 404 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Better

36 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Nathan Better
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 26
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 109
  • Internal Medicine 11
  • Transplantation 8
Replace Asim Mohammed with:
Asim Mohammed United States
Hector R. Villarraga United States
Pablo Piñón-Esteban Spain
Giuseppe Di Tano Italy
Massimiliano Danti Italy
Francesca Bonura Italy
Mirza Dilić Bosnia and Herzegovina
Martijn J. A. Gondrie Netherlands
Renée P. Bullock-Palmer United States
Kara Thompson United States
Nathan Better relative to Asim Mohammed United States Asim Mohammed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Asim Mohammed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Better

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Better's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Better with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Better more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Better

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Better. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Better. The network helps show where Nathan Better may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Better, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Better Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Better links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200699
2 200081
3 202032
4 201523
5 201522
6 201419
7 200816
8 200215
9 201212
10 202012
11 20168
12 20117
13 20215
14 20205
15 20214
16
Demonstration of viable, stunned myocardium with technetium-99m-sestamibi.
19944
17 20174
18 20243
19 20223
20 20173

About Nathan Better

Nathan Better is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (13 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (26 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (109 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations) and Transplantation (8 citations). Nathan Better has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Green, Raymond Ng, Leeanne Grigg, Colin Royse, Alistair Royse, Silvana Marasco, David Hunt, James Tatoulis, Pallav Shah and Andrew J. Einstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, International Journal of Cardiology, Circulation Journal, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact