Natalie Wright

36 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Natalie Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Clinical Psychology 99
  • Mechanical Engineering 158
  • Education 127
  • Architecture 16
  • Computer Science Applications 17
Replace Dieter J. Schönwetter with:
Dieter J. Schönwetter Canada
Hsing‐Yuan Liu Taiwan
Karolina Doulougeri Netherlands
Yuhsuan Chang Taiwan
Martin Gartmeier Germany
Robert Lee United States
Yan Zhao Wu China
Rosemary D. Meza United States
Deirdre O’Donnell Ireland
Susan M. Miller United States
Natalie Wright relative to Dieter J. Schönwetter Canada Dieter J. Schönwetter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Dieter J. Schönwetter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Wright. The network helps show where Natalie Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Wright Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020162
2 201893
3 201764
4 201938
5 202036
6 202033
7 202117
8 201815
9 201311
10 202211
11 202010
12 20139
13
Educating the creative citizen. Design education programs in the knowledge economy
20148
14 20228
15 20007
16 20237
17 20247
18 20145
19 20215
20 20174

About Natalie Wright

Natalie Wright is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Management of Technology and Innovation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (17 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Digital Education and Society (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Education and Work Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (99 citations), Mechanical Engineering (158 citations), Education (127 citations), Architecture (16 citations) and Computer Science Applications (17 citations). Natalie Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cara Wrigley, William Henley, Byron Creese, Anne Corbett, Ingelin Testad, Zunera Khan, Dag Aarsland, Siobhan O’Dwyer, Clive G. Ballard and Leslie Dawes. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Technology and Design Education, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, International Psychogeriatrics, Health & Social Care in the Community and Emergency Medicine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact