Natalie Nardone

1.4k citations
35 papers · 1.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

  • Physiology top 2%
    • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
    • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
    • Ocular Infections and Treatments

Papers in

Natalie Nardone

35 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Natalie Nardone
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Physiology 677
  • Ophthalmology 166
  • Clinical Psychology 64
  • Social Psychology 62
  • Periodontics 14
Replace Eleanor L.S. Leavens with:
Eleanor L.S. Leavens United States
Anna Schoeni Switzerland
Marilena Giovanna Maglia Italy
So Hyun Park United States
Victoria R. Green United States
Sharon Cox United Kingdom
Ramesh C. Mishra India
Christin Gerhardt Switzerland
Allison Glasser United States
Nicholas H. Caskey United States
Natalie Nardone relative to Eleanor L.S. Leavens United States Eleanor L.S. Leavens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×83×
Eleanor L.S. Leavens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Nardone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Nardone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Nardone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Nardone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Nardone. The network helps show where Natalie Nardone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Nardone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Nardone Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Nardone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018166
2 2009104
3 201485
4 201964
5 201649
6 201645
7 201945
8 201844
9 201943
10 201340
11 201535
12 201935
13 201831
14 201628
15 201728
16 201326
17 201426
18 201122
19 201922
20 201121

About Natalie Nardone

Natalie Nardone is a scholar working on Physiology, Ophthalmology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Toxicology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (27 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1 paper), Family Dynamics and Relationships (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (677 citations), Ophthalmology (166 citations), Clinical Psychology (64 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations) and Periodontics (14 citations). Natalie Nardone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Neal L. Benowitz, Gideon St. Helen, Gary Lewandowski, Peyton Jacob, Peyton Jacob, Newton Addo, Delia A Dempsey, Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Evangelia Liakoni and Nisha R. Acharya. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Addiction, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Tobacco Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact