Natalie Nardone

1.4k citations
33 papers · 1.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Nardone

33 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

Natalie Nardone
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Physiology 538
  • Ophthalmology 126
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 101
  • Social Psychology 101
Replace Maria A. Parker with:
Maria A. Parker United States
Won Seok Choi South Korea
Eleanor L.S. Leavens United States
Youn Ok Lee United States
Beatriz Navarro Bravo Spain
Cristina A. Fernandez United States
Vili Nosa New Zealand
Krystyna Kowalczuk Poland
Catherine M. Birt Canada
Jessica L. King United States
Natalie Nardone relative to Maria A. Parker United States Maria A. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Maria A. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Nardone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Nardone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Nardone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Nardone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Nardone. The network helps show where Natalie Nardone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Nardone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Nardone Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Nardone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018158
2 2009107
3 201480
4 201962
5 201945
6 201644
7 201643
8 201843
9 201938
10 201336
11 201831
12 201931
13 201529
14 201728
15 201324
16 201424
17 201623
18 201922
19 201122
20 201119

About Natalie Nardone

Natalie Nardone is a scholar working on Physiology, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Social Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (22 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Coffee research and impacts (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (538 citations), Ophthalmology (126 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (101 citations) and Social Psychology (101 citations). Natalie Nardone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Neal L. Benowitz, Gideon St. Helen, Gary Lewandowski, Peyton Jacob, Peyton Jacob, Newton Addo, Delia Dempsey, Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Evangelia Liakoni and Eric C. Donny. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Addiction, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Tobacco Control and Self and Identity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact