Natalia Stepanova

586 citations
93 papers · 320 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Natalia Stepanova

60 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Natalia Stepanova
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Nephrology 102
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 25
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 92
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
  • Urology 11
Replace Mehtap Erkmen Uyar with:
Mehtap Erkmen Uyar Türkiye
Chia‐Jen Shih Taiwan
Nicholas Cole United Kingdom
Christian Schnedl Austria
Hark Rım South Korea
Phuong-Thu Pham United States
Fabiola Martín-del-Campo Mexico
Nina Kaegi-Braun Switzerland
Amnart Chaiprasert Thailand
Seolhye Kim South Korea
Natalia Stepanova relative to Mehtap Erkmen Uyar Türkiye Mehtap Erkmen Uyar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mehtap Erkmen Uyar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Stepanova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Stepanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Stepanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Stepanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Stepanova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Stepanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Stepanova. The network helps show where Natalia Stepanova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Stepanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Stepanova Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Stepanova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202217
2 202316
3 202115
4 202414
5 201914
6 201713
7 201913
8 202312
9 202111
10 202211
11
[Proinflammatory cytokines in patients with pyelonephritis].
201310
12 20219
13 20199
14 20248
15 20228
16 20218
17 20207
18 20246
19 20236
20 20186

About Natalia Stepanova

Natalia Stepanova is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 93 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (23 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (16 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (11 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (11 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (7 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (102 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (25 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (92 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Urology (11 citations). Natalia Stepanova has collaborated with scholars based in Ukraine, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include М. Kolesnyk, Ganna Tolstanova, James M. Shultz, Jeffrey L. Hymes, Joshua Krusell, Анна Петрова, Zelde Espinel, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen and І. Dudar. Their work appears in journals such as Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Journal of Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact