Nat Sakimura

557 citations
6 papers · 15 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Communications in computer and information science (1 paper)IGI Global eBooks (1 paper)
Partner nations
Japan

In The Last Decade

Nat Sakimura

5 papers receiving 9 citations

Peers

Nat Sakimura
Comparison fields: 5 of 7
  • Hardware and Architecture 3
  • Information Systems 8
  • Computer Networks and Communications 6
  • Artificial Intelligence 8
  • Signal Processing 1
Replace K. Purahoo with:
K. Purahoo United Kingdom
K. Ohrenberg Germany
Benjamin Fuhrer United Kingdom
F. Tian United States
S. H. Cheng United States
Sartaj Singh India
David Carrel United States
Hartmut Schultze Germany
Raúl Casanova-Marqués Czechia
Chonglin Sun China
Nat Sakimura relative to K. Purahoo United Kingdom K. Purahoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
K. Purahoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nat Sakimura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nat Sakimura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nat Sakimura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nat Sakimura more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nat Sakimura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nat Sakimura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nat Sakimura. The network helps show where Nat Sakimura may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nat Sakimura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nat Sakimura Line = papers co-authored together Nat Sakimura links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
JSON Web Token (JWT) draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-02
20135
2
JSON Web Signature (JWS) draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-11
20134
3
OAuth 2.0 Mix-Up Mitigation
20163
4 20102
5
JSON Web Token (JWT) draft-jones-json-web-token-06
20121
6 20130

About Nat Sakimura

Nat Sakimura is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 15 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Access Control and Trust (3 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (2 papers), IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Security and Verification in Computing (1 paper), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (1 paper), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper) and Web Application Security Vulnerabilities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (3 citations), Information Systems (8 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (6 citations), Artificial Intelligence (8 citations) and Signal Processing (1 citation). Nat Sakimura has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include John Bradley and M. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in computer and information science and IGI Global eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact