Nanda Gamad

673 citations
17 papers · 536 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nanda Gamad

15 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Nanda Gamad
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 110
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 154
  • Biochemistry 37
  • Pharmacology 41
  • Nephrology 30
Replace Rajiv Malhotra with:
Rajiv Malhotra United States
Ebtehal El‐Demerdash Egypt
Tung‐Wei Hung Taiwan
Marwa M. Khalaf Egypt
Wani Arjumand India
Hebatallah Husseini Atteia Egypt
Amy C. Keller United States
Mohamed M. Elseweidy Egypt
Yiyi Jin China
Iman O. Sherif Egypt
Nanda Gamad relative to Rajiv Malhotra United States Rajiv Malhotra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Rajiv Malhotra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nanda Gamad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nanda Gamad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanda Gamad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanda Gamad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nanda Gamad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nanda Gamad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nanda Gamad. The network helps show where Nanda Gamad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nanda Gamad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nanda Gamad Line = papers co-authored together Nanda Gamad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2014105
2 201693
3 201575
4 201673
5 201766
6 201646
7 201633
8 201621
9 20217
10 20225
11 20215
12 20232
13 20222
14 20142
15 20221
16 20200
17 20210

About Nanda Gamad

Nanda Gamad is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Nephrology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (3 papers), Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (2 papers), Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Mangiferin and Mango Extracts (1 paper) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (110 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (154 citations), Biochemistry (37 citations), Pharmacology (41 citations) and Nephrology (30 citations). Nanda Gamad has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Arab Emirates and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Jagriti Bhatia, Salma Malik, Kapil Suchal, Dharamvir Singh Arya, Amit Kumar Dinda, Rajiv Malhotra, Sameer N. Goyal, Shreesh Ojha, Uma Chaudhary and Sudheer Arava. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, Phytomedicine and Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact