Nancy Keir

36 papers receiving 745 citations

Peers

Nancy Keir
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Ophthalmology 335
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 676
  • Immunology and Allergy 115
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 408
  • Dermatology 117
Replace Doris Richter with:
Doris Richter Canada
Jami Kern United States
Adrian S. Bruce Australia
Carlos García‐Resúa Spain
Kathryn Dumbleton Canada
Cécile Maïssa United Kingdom
Sheila Hickson-Curran United States
Joan M. Exford United States
Andrew D. Graham United States
Jacqueline Tan Australia
Nancy Keir relative to Doris Richter Canada Doris Richter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Doris Richter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Keir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Keir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Keir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Keir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Keir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Keir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Keir. The network helps show where Nancy Keir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Keir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Keir Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Keir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013216
2 200682
3 201263
4 202151
5 201046
6 200941
7 201338
8 200933
9 201330
10 201528
11 201220
12 200919
13 201317
14 201314
15 201114
16 201911
17 20207
18
The Impact of Post–Insertion Time on Corneal Staining and Comfort With Group II Hydrogel Materials Disinfected With Various Lens Care Regimens
20055
19 20105
20 20115

About Nancy Keir

Nancy Keir is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 38 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (29 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (8 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (335 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (676 citations), Immunology and Allergy (115 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (408 citations) and Dermatology (117 citations). Nancy Keir has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Lyndon Jones, Trefford Simpson, Craig A. Woods, Ping Situ, Donald R. Korb, William Ngo, Caroline A. Blackie, Desmond Fonn, Kathryn Dumbleton and Jalaiah Varikooty. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice and Journal of Optometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact