Nancy E. Riley

1.6k citations
39 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy E. Riley

37 papers receiving 867 citations

Peers

Nancy E. Riley
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Gender Studies 366
  • Demography 184
  • Reproductive Medicine 99
  • Sociology and Political Science 505
  • Safety Research 86
Replace Renate Duelli Klein with:
Renate Duelli Klein Australia
Diana Tietjens Meyers United States
France Winddance Twine United States
Joseph M. Hawes United States
Anna Rotkirch Finland
Marc Epprecht Canada
Miriam Z. Langsam United States
Shelley Budgeon United Kingdom
Maureen Sullivan United States
Lenore J. Weitzman United States
Nancy E. Riley relative to Renate Duelli Klein Australia Renate Duelli Klein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Renate Duelli Klein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy E. Riley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy E. Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy E. Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy E. Riley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy E. Riley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy E. Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy E. Riley. The network helps show where Nancy E. Riley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Nancy E. Riley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy E. Riley Line = papers co-authored together Nancy E. Riley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999245
2 1992141
3 2012115
4 199486
5 200357
6 200154
7 199747
8 201142
9 199139
10
199935
11 199833
12 199726
13 201220
14 201918
15 201015
16
Making Families Through Adoption
201110
17 19969
18 20069
19 19967
20 20187

About Nancy E. Riley

Nancy E. Riley is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Safety Research and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (19 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (366 citations), Demography (184 citations), Reproductive Medicine (99 citations), Sociology and Political Science (505 citations) and Safety Research (86 citations). Nancy E. Riley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Adele E. Clarke, Feng Wang, James McCarthy, Peter Schneider, Jane C. Schneider, Krista E. Van Vleet, Luanna B. Prevost, Matthew D. Lovelace, Melinda S. Camus and Lincoln R. Larson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Population and Development Review, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Social Forces and Signs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact