Naim Logic

679 citations
15 papers · 539 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Naim Logic

15 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Naim Logic
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Control and Systems Engineering 374
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 470
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 68
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 59
  • Artificial Intelligence 64
Replace Jiecheng Zhao with:
Jiecheng Zhao United States
Slava Maslennikov United States
J.M. Johnson United States
R.O. Burnett United States
Marco Pignati Switzerland
Jason Bank United States
Manu Parashar United States
P. Rousseaux Belgium
Chawasak Rakpenthai Thailand
R.J. Murphy United States
Naim Logic relative to Jiecheng Zhao United States Jiecheng Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Jiecheng Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naim Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naim Logic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naim Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naim Logic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naim Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naim Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naim Logic. The network helps show where Naim Logic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Naim Logic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naim Logic Line = papers co-authored together Naim Logic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2009113
2 200888
3 201086
4 201282
5 201256
6 201527
7 201125
8 201221
9 201013
10 201312
11 20057
12 20056
13
Power System State Estimation
20101
14 20101
15 20041

About Naim Logic

Naim Logic is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Power System Optimization and Stability (13 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (8 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (5 papers), Optimal Power Flow Distribution (4 papers), Smart Grid Security and Resilience (2 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization (1 paper) and Electric Power System Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (374 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (470 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (68 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (59 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (64 citations). Naim Logic has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Tylavsky, Di Shi, Vijay Vittal, Ruisheng Diao, G.T. Heydt, Yacine Chakhchoukh, Qing Zhang, Qing Zhang, Elias Kyriakides and Bharat Singh. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Electric Power Components and Systems and IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact