Nadia Saeed

459 citations
52 papers · 332 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Saeed

48 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Nadia Saeed
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 35
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 153
  • Statistics and Probability 30
  • Surgery 141
  • Gastroenterology 15
Replace Emil ter Veer with:
Emil ter Veer Netherlands
Edmund Jones United Kingdom
Tina T. Ng United States
Xiang Feng China
Carmelo Quattrone Italy
Łukasz Pyka Poland
Matthew V. Abola United States
James J. Wu Australia
L. Cunha-Miranda Portugal
Elizabeth Cottrill United States
Nadia Saeed relative to Emil ter Veer Netherlands Emil ter Veer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emil ter Veer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Saeed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Saeed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Saeed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Saeed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Saeed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Saeed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Saeed. The network helps show where Nadia Saeed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Saeed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Saeed Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Saeed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201535
2 201426
3
Frequency of patients with diabetes taking proper foot care according to international guidelines and its impact on their foot health.
201026
4 201324
5 201623
6 201617
7 201516
8 201715
9 202011
10 201611
11 20219
12 20219
13 20188
14 20187
15 20216
16 20166
17 20216
18 20186
19 20235
20 20215

About Nadia Saeed

Nadia Saeed is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (11 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (8 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (7 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (35 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (153 citations), Statistics and Probability (30 citations), Surgery (141 citations) and Gastroenterology (15 citations). Nadia Saeed has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E. Hoffe, Khaldoun Almhanna, Ravi Shridhar, Kenneth Meredith, Jamal Zafar, Jessica M. Frakes, José M. Pimiento, Shahid Kamal, Shams Rahman and Hui‐Yi Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Future Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Molecular Genetics and Genomics and Diseases of the Esophagus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact