Nadia Ouamara

837 citations
15 papers · 256 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Ouamara

14 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Nadia Ouamara
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Neurology 63
  • Developmental Neuroscience 31
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 130
  • Ophthalmology 45
  • Immunology 71
Replace Kimberly M. Winges with:
Kimberly M. Winges United States
G. Meucci Italy
Jeffrey Lambe United States
Ann J. Ligocki United States
Nik Krajnc Austria
Carmen Lienert Switzerland
Robert A Bermel United States
Fabio Brusaferri Italy
I. D. Stolyarov Russia
François Jacques Canada
Nadia Ouamara relative to Kimberly M. Winges United States Kimberly M. Winges's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Kimberly M. Winges · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Ouamara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Ouamara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Ouamara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Ouamara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Ouamara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Ouamara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Ouamara. The network helps show where Nadia Ouamara may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Ouamara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Ouamara Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Ouamara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012144
2 201025
3 201720
4 201716
5 201710
6 20179
7 20228
8 20178
9 20226
10 20184
11
Higher-order aberrations after DSEAK, thin DSEAK and DMEK: comparative study about 60 cases
20162
12 20212
13
Is keratoconus risk associated with genetic variation of aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH3A1 gene
20161
14 20201
15 20220

About Nadia Ouamara

Nadia Ouamara is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper) and Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (63 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (130 citations), Ophthalmology (45 citations) and Immunology (71 citations). Nadia Ouamara has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amit Bar‐Or, Robert P. Lisak, Sathyanath Rajasekharan, Samia Ragheb, Liljana Nedelkoska, Boli Fan, Joyce A. Benjamins, Trina Johnson, Christophe Goetz and Jean‐Marc Perone. Their work appears in journals such as Cornea, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Neuroimmunology, BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies and European Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact