Nadia Craddock
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 19
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 9
- Pharmacy 11
- Obesity and Health Practices 11
- Co-authors
- Phillippa C. Diedrichs (16 shared papers)Hemal Shroff (1 shared paper)Jessica M. Alleva (3 shared papers)Nicole Paraskeva (2 shared papers)Ncoza C. Dlova (1 shared paper)Paul White (10 shared papers)Kirsty M. Garbett (10 shared papers)Viren Swami (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Body Image (17 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Frontiers in Sociology (2 papers)Ethnic and Racial Studies (2 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndonesia
In The Last Decade
Nadia Craddock
31 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Pharmacy 57
- Clinical Psychology 242
- Marketing 49
- Gender Studies 49
- Applied Psychology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Craddock
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Craddock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Craddock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Craddock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Craddock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Craddock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Craddock. The network helps show where Nadia Craddock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Craddock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 |
About Nadia Craddock
Nadia Craddock is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Gender Studies, Dermatology and Marketing, having authored 35 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (11 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Marketing (49 citations), Gender Studies (49 citations) and Applied Psychology (23 citations). Nadia Craddock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Phillippa C. Diedrichs, Hemal Shroff, Jessica M. Alleva, Nicole Paraskeva, Ncoza C. Dlova, Paul White, Kirsty M. Garbett, Viren Swami, Deborah Talamonti and Benjamin Gibson. Their work appears in journals such as Body Image, BMC Public Health, Frontiers in Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.