Nadia Craddock
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 19
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 12
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
- Pharmacy 11
- Obesity and Health Practices 11
- Co-authors
- Phillippa C. Diedrichs (15 shared papers)Hemal Shroff (1 shared paper)Jessica M. Alleva (3 shared papers)Nicole Paraskeva (2 shared papers)Kirsty M. Garbett (10 shared papers)Mark Forshaw (1 shared paper)Paul White (10 shared papers)Deborah Talamonti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Body Image (15 papers)Frontiers in Sociology (2 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Ethnic and Racial Studies (2 papers)International Journal of Eating Disorders (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndonesia
In The Last Decade
Nadia Craddock
29 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Pharmacy 62
- Clinical Psychology 240
- Marketing 54
- Gender Studies 51
- Applied Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Craddock
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Craddock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Craddock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Craddock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Craddock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Craddock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Craddock. The network helps show where Nadia Craddock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Craddock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 4 |
About Nadia Craddock
Nadia Craddock is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Dermatology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (11 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (240 citations), Marketing (54 citations), Gender Studies (51 citations) and Applied Psychology (26 citations). Nadia Craddock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Phillippa C. Diedrichs, Hemal Shroff, Jessica M. Alleva, Nicole Paraskeva, Kirsty M. Garbett, Mark Forshaw, Paul White, Deborah Talamonti, Benjamin Gibson and Jekaterina Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Body Image, Frontiers in Sociology, BMC Public Health, Ethnic and Racial Studies and International Journal of Eating Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.