Nadia Cattari

405 citations
21 papers · 275 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Cattari

21 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Nadia Cattari
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Human-Computer Interaction 75
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 177
  • Surgery 117
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Media Technology 20
Replace Sandro Michael Heining with:
Sandro Michael Heining Germany
Alejandro Martin‐Gomez United States
Florian Heinrich Germany
Daniel Andersen United States
Woo Jin Ahn South Korea
Hayeem L. Rudy United States
Puxun Tu China
Oscar Meruvia-Pastor Canada
Simon Drouin Canada
Patrick Saalfeld Germany
Nadia Cattari relative to Sandro Michael Heining Germany Sandro Michael Heining's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Sandro Michael Heining · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Cattari

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Cattari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Cattari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Cattari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Cattari

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Cattari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Cattari. The network helps show where Nadia Cattari may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Cattari, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Cattari Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Cattari links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201947
2 202141
3 202133
4 201921
5 202020
6 202020
7 202119
8 202116
9 201914
10 20259
11 20186
12 20235
13 20215
14 20204
15 20224
16 20214
17 20252
18 20242
19 20241
20 20231

About Nadia Cattari

Nadia Cattari is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Human-Computer Interaction, Biomedical Engineering and Media Technology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (18 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (8 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (7 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (6 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers) and Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (75 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (177 citations), Surgery (117 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Media Technology (20 citations). Nadia Cattari has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio Cutolo, Vincenzo Ferrari, Sara Condino, Nicola Montemurro, Benish Fida, Ulrich W. Thomale, Mauro Ferrari, Marina Carbone, Paolo Domenico Parchi and Roberta Piazza. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Sensors, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Applied Sciences and IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact