Nadia Bartolini

631 citations
23 papers · 338 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Bartolini

21 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Nadia Bartolini
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Geography, Planning and Development 147
  • Space and Planetary Science 31
  • Conservation 45
  • Museology 46
  • Archeology 126
Replace Þóra Pétursdóttir with:
Þóra Pétursdóttir Norway
Susan McIntyre-Tamwoy Australia
Steve Hemming Australia
Sally Foster United Kingdom
Paul Graves‐Brown United Kingdom
Natasha Lyons Canada
John H. Jameson United States
Thomas F. King United States
Traci Ardren United States
Terje Oestigaard Norway
Nadia Bartolini relative to Þóra Pétursdóttir Norway Þóra Pétursdóttir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Þóra Pétursdóttir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Bartolini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Bartolini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Bartolini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Bartolini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Bartolini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Bartolini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Bartolini. The network helps show where Nadia Bartolini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Bartolini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Bartolini Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Bartolini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202083
2 201842
3 201635
4 201623
5 201322
6 202018
7 201916
8 202015
9 201713
10 201513
11 201312
12 201310
13 20178
14 20207
15 20175
16 20164
17 20184
18 20193
19 20242
20
Nature Light Truth: An exploration of Spiritualism in the Everyday Life of Stoke-on-Trent
20162

About Nadia Bartolini

Nadia Bartolini is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Archeology, Anthropology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (12 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (9 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (6 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (147 citations), Space and Planetary Science (31 citations), Conservation (45 citations), Museology (46 citations) and Archeology (126 citations). Nadia Bartolini has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Caitlin DeSilvey, Sara MacKian, Steve Pile, Jennie Morgan, Cornelius Holtorf, Rodney Harrison, Sharon Macdonald, Harald Fredheim, Tim Edensor and Shannon Lee Dawdy. Their work appears in journals such as Social & Cultural Geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, International Journal of Heritage Studies, Dialogues in Human Geography and Geoforum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact