Nadia Ali
Impact in
- Physiology top 10%
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
-
- Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Papers in
- Physiology 15
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research 11
- Genetics 12
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 6
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 6
- Co-authors
- Emily C. Lisi (5 shared papers)Cynthia R. Cimino (2 shared papers)Dawn A. Laney (5 shared papers)Scott Gillespie (2 shared papers)Stephanie Cagle (4 shared papers)Samir Belal (7 shared papers)Karrie A. Weber (1 shared paper)Cecelia Bellcross (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Molecular Genetics and Metabolism (7 papers)Epilepsy & Behavior (2 papers)Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2 papers)Neuropsychology (2 papers)Journal of Neural Transmission (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTunisiaPakistan
In The Last Decade
Nadia Ali
60 papers receiving 436 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Physiology 162
- Rheumatology 67
- Clinical Biochemistry 30
- Psychiatry and Mental health 49
- Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Ali
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Ali more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Ali
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Ali. The network helps show where Nadia Ali may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Ali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 8 |
About Nadia Ali
Nadia Ali is a scholar working on Physiology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology, Rheumatology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 71 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (11 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (162 citations), Rheumatology (67 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (30 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Nadia Ali has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tunisia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Emily C. Lisi, Cynthia R. Cimino, Dawn A. Laney, Scott Gillespie, Stephanie Cagle, Samir Belal, Karrie A. Weber, Cecelia Bellcross, John D. Coates and Kyle Rudser. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Epilepsy & Behavior, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Neuropsychology and Journal of Neural Transmission.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.