Nabil Matar

1.2k citations
71 papers · 356 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
    • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
    • Philippine History and Culture
  • History top 2%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

Nabil Matar

53 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Nabil Matar
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Anthropology 104
  • History 96
  • Political Science and International Relations 137
  • Religious studies 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
Replace Srinivas Aravamudan with:
Srinivas Aravamudan United States
Roderick Beaton United Kingdom
Mary Baine Campbell United States
Roxann Wheeler United States
Willy Maley United Kingdom
Paul J. Hauben United States
Tim Fulford United Kingdom
Gerald Strauss United States
Davis Bitton United States
Peter J. Kitson United Kingdom
Nabil Matar relative to Srinivas Aravamudan United States Srinivas Aravamudan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Srinivas Aravamudan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Matar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Matar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Matar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Matar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Matar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Matar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Matar. The network helps show where Nabil Matar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Nabil Matar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nabil Matar Line = papers co-authored together Nabil Matar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199868
2 201132
3 200623
4 199314
5 201413
6 200113
7 201212
8
'Turning Turk': Conversion to Islam in English Renaissance Thought
199411
9 199410
10 200810
11 200910
12 199110
13 200310
14 20139
15 19978
16 20057
17 20136
18 19936
19 19856
20 19965

About Nabil Matar

Nabil Matar is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Anthropology and Religious studies, having authored 71 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (26 papers), Islamic Studies and History (21 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (8 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (7 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (6 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (6 papers) and Hispanic-African Historical Relations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (104 citations), History (96 citations), Political Science and International Relations (137 citations), Religious studies (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (163 citations). Nabil Matar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Gerald MacLean. Their work appears in journals such as The Seventeenth Century, Notes and Queries, The Muslim World, Journal of Islamic Studies and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact