Na Dong

114 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Na Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 118
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 326
  • Artificial Intelligence 455
  • Management Science and Operations Research 171
  • Control and Systems Engineering 316
Replace Xiaoping Ma with:
Xiaoping Ma China
Junjie Xu China
Muhammad Hisyam Lee Malaysia
Vojislav Kecman New Zealand
Jia Wu China
Ding Liu China
R.E. Uhrig United States
Wei Chen China
Xinhua Yang China
Na Dong relative to Xiaoping Ma China Xiaoping Ma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Xiaoping Ma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Dong. The network helps show where Na Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Dong Line = papers co-authored together Na Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010217
2 2020183
3 2016156
4 2019130
5 201560
6 201960
7 201253
8 202051
9 201850
10 201949
11 202141
12 201640
13 202040
14 202139
15 202138
16 202235
17 201633
18 201633
19 201627
20 202124

About Na Dong

Na Dong is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 127 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Control Systems Optimization (11 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (10 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (8 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (8 papers), Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control (7 papers), Iterative Learning Control Systems (7 papers) and AI in cancer detection (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (118 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (326 citations), Artificial Intelligence (455 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (171 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (316 citations). Na Dong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhongke Gao, Ai‐Guo Wu, C.H. Wu, Jianfang Chang, Yuxuan Yang, J. F. Chang, Liang Zhao, Pengcheng Xu, Hu‐Chen Liu and Long Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinear Dynamics, Expert Systems with Applications, Neurocomputing, Applied Soft Computing and Computer Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact