N. Lucas

1.2k citations
19 papers · 267 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

N. Lucas

16 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

N. Lucas
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 142
  • Developmental Neuroscience 48
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 31
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
  • Emergency Medical Services 14
Replace R. G. Paul with:
R. G. Paul United Kingdom
W. R. Jonker United Kingdom
Óscar Díaz‐Cambronero Spain
D. G. Bogod United Kingdom
Dennis Ong Canada
Bora Aykaç Türkiye
Waraporn Chau-In Thailand
Islam Massad Jordan
Stephan R. Thilen United States
Eric L. Bloomfield United States
N. Lucas relative to R. G. Paul United Kingdom R. G. Paul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
R. G. Paul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Lucas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Lucas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Lucas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Lucas. The network helps show where N. Lucas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Lucas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Lucas Line = papers co-authored together N. Lucas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201483
2 201438
3 201431
4 197529
5 201423
6 202217
7 202016
8 20236
9 20155
10 20215
11
When should the "infected" subcutaneous infusion reservoir be removed?
19965
12 20194
13 20232
14
Developing a pre-eclampsia core outcome set. Round 1 results: 283 healthcare professionals, 41 researchers and 112 patients from 55 countries participated
20171
15 20111
16 20241
17 20230
18 20250
19 20230

About N. Lucas

N. Lucas is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Developmental Neuroscience and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 19 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (142 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (48 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (31 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (80 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (14 citations). N. Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Tim Cook, E. O’Sullivan, D. Bogod, F. Plaat, M. Wang, J. H. Mackay, H. Torevell, Jeremy Radcliffe, J. H. Palmer and Michael R. J. Sury. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and BJA Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact