N. Angert

52 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers

N. Angert
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Computational Mechanics 336
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 270
  • Radiation 73
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 369
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 43
Replace P. J. Scanlon with:
P. J. Scanlon Canada
Teck‐Yong Tou Malaysia
C.J. Sofield United Kingdom
William E. Case United States
Hood Chatham United States
Gy. Vı́kor Hungary
M. Delaunay France
М. Н. Дроздов Russia
B. Vidal France
W. Katz United States
N. Angert relative to P. J. Scanlon Canada P. J. Scanlon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
P. J. Scanlon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Angert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Angert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Angert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Angert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Angert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Angert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Angert. The network helps show where N. Angert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Angert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Angert Line = papers co-authored together N. Angert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996107
2 199455
3 199650
4 199142
5 199941
6 199440
7 199439
8 199838
9 199534
10 200128
11 199927
12 199122
13 200021
14 199219
15 199318
16 199716
17 199814
18 196813
19 199613
20 199413

About N. Angert

N. Angert is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion-surface interactions and analysis (22 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (18 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (7 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (6 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (336 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (270 citations), Radiation (73 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (369 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (43 citations). N. Angert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Vetter, C. Trautmann, Ronny Neumann, D. Dobrev, R. Spohr, W. Brüchle, Jörg Ackermann, Thomas Hagen, R. Scholz and W. Spies. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Physics Letters A, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact