Murray Scher

687 citations
26 papers · 549 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Murray Scher

25 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Murray Scher
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Gender Studies 168
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Clinical Psychology 123
  • Social Psychology 122
  • General Psychology 7
Replace Richard Hagan with:
Richard Hagan United States
William Fowler United States
George A. Rekers United States
Elizabeth M. Salter United States
Robert J. Landy United States
Sally C. Johnson United States
Scott Hubbard United States
Thomas G. Smith United States
Sarah A. O. Gray United States
John B. McDevitt United States
Murray Scher relative to Richard Hagan United States Richard Hagan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Hagan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Murray Scher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Murray Scher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Murray Scher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murray Scher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Murray Scher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Murray Scher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Murray Scher. The network helps show where Murray Scher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Murray Scher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Murray Scher Line = papers co-authored together Murray Scher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969155
2 199091
3 197053
4 198729
5 197529
6 198125
7 197924
8 197421
9 199019
10
Handbook of counseling & psychotherapy with men
198715
11 199015
12 198113
13 196912
14
Male Therapist, Male Client: Reflections on Critical Dynamics.
200512
15 19716
16
Alteration of the state of motion of a human being in free fall
19696
17 19795
18 19905
19
Men and Boys, Myths and Mythic Proportions: A Rejoinder to Kelly and Hall.
19934
20 19793

About Murray Scher

Murray Scher is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), Coaching Methods and Impact (2 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (2 papers), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (2 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (168 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), Clinical Psychology (123 citations), Social Psychology (122 citations) and General Psychology (7 citations). Murray Scher has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include T. R. Kane, Glenn E. Good, Lucia A. Gilbert, Mark Stevens, Margaret Barr and Harry J. Canon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling & Development, AIAA Journal, The Journal of Men s Studies, International Journal of Solids and Structures and Journal of Counseling Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact