M.P. Oomen

1.0k citations
37 papers · 858 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

M.P. Oomen

36 papers receiving 805 citations

Peers

M.P. Oomen
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Condensed Matter Physics 733
  • Biomedical Engineering 481
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 204
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 398
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 82
Replace C.C. Clickner with:
C.C. Clickner United States
M. Ueyama Japan
N. Ayai Japan
J. Tenbrink Germany
Kohei Higashikawa Japan
Hunju Lee South Korea
Alexander Molodyk Russia
H.-W. Neumueller Germany
H. Miao United States
Christian Barth Switzerland
M.P. Oomen relative to C.C. Clickner United States C.C. Clickner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
C.C. Clickner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.P. Oomen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.P. Oomen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.P. Oomen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.P. Oomen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.P. Oomen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.P. Oomen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.P. Oomen. The network helps show where M.P. Oomen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.P. Oomen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.P. Oomen Line = papers co-authored together M.P. Oomen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999141
2 200373
3 200566
4 201255
5 201051
6 200347
7 199737
8 200234
9 199734
10 201831
11 199830
12
AC loss in superconducting tapes and cables
200028
13 201823
14 199822
15 199821
16 200419
17 200319
18 200015
19 201714
20 200113

About M.P. Oomen

M.P. Oomen is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 858 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (31 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (25 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (15 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (8 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (4 papers), Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics (3 papers) and Frequency Control in Power Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (733 citations), Biomedical Engineering (481 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (204 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (398 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (82 citations). M.P. Oomen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Leghissa, J. Rieger, Herman H.J. ten Kate, B. ten Haken, H.-W. Neumueller, J.J. Rabbers, G. Ries, A. Usoskin, Tabea Arndt and H.C. Freyhardt. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physica C Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters and Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact