Mona Askar
Impact in
- Hepatology top 10%
- Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
-
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Viral Infections and Vectors
- Amoebic Infections and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology 1
- Viral Infections and Vectors 1
-
- Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases 1
- Co-authors
- Klaus Stark (3 shared papers)Mirko Faber (1 shared paper)Hendrik Wilking (2 shared papers)Lars Schaade (1 shared paper)Andreas Nitsche (1 shared paper)Anja Takla (1 shared paper)Tanja Ducomble (1 shared paper)Andreas Kurth (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Eurosurveillance (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Emerging infectious diseases (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mona Askar
5 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Hepatology 46
- Infectious Diseases 88
- Parasitology 32
- Agronomy and Crop Science 23
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mona Askar
This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Askar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Askar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Askar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Askar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Askar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Askar. The network helps show where Mona Askar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mona Askar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 4 | Comparison of phenytoin with auranofin and chloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis--a double blind study. | 1995 | 10 |
| 5 | 2013 | 4 |
About Mona Askar
Mona Askar is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Small Animals, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Hepatology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (1 paper), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper), Viral Infections and Vectors (1 paper), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (1 paper), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (88 citations), Parasitology (32 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (23 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (32 citations). Mona Askar has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Stark, Mirko Faber, Hendrik Wilking, Lars Schaade, Andreas Nitsche, Anja Takla, Tanja Ducomble, Andreas Kurth, Sven Poppert and Rachel M. Chalmers. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Infectious Diseases, Eurosurveillance, BMJ Open, Emerging infectious diseases and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.