Moab Arar

410 citations
11 papers · 263 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Moab Arar

11 papers receiving 256 citations

Moab Arar's Hit Papers

Encoder-based Domain Tuning for Fast Personalization of Text-to-Image Models 2023 · 121 citations
1210+1+2Years since publication4080120

Peers

Moab Arar
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 40
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 191
  • Media Technology 15
  • Artificial Intelligence 52
  • Signal Processing 17
Replace Changzhi Luo with:
Changzhi Luo China
Jeff Pool United States
Yingya Zhang China
Guangyong Gao China
Zhenyu Li China
Jongwook Choi South Korea
Konpat Preechakul Thailand
Chi‐Fang Lin Taiwan
Avi Schwarzschild United States
Da-Chun Wu Taiwan
Moab Arar relative to Changzhi Luo China Changzhi Luo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Changzhi Luo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moab Arar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moab Arar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moab Arar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moab Arar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moab Arar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moab Arar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moab Arar. The network helps show where Moab Arar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Moab Arar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moab Arar Line = papers co-authored together Moab Arar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Encoder-based Domain Tuning for Fast Personalization of Text-to-Image Models
Hit paper breakdown →
2023121
2 202343
3 202122
4 202221
5 201812
6 202412
7 202012
8 202411
9 20156
10 20242
11 20211

About Moab Arar

Moab Arar is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, General Social Sciences, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Artificial Intelligence and Software, having authored 11 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis (4 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (3 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (2 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (1 paper) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (40 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (191 citations), Media Technology (15 citations), Artificial Intelligence (52 citations) and Signal Processing (17 citations). Moab Arar has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Cohen‐Or, Amit Haim Bermano, Yuval Atzmon, Gal Chechik, Rinon Gal, Ariel Shamir, Omri Avrahami, Amir Hertz, Shiri Chechik and Clifford Stein. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computational Visual Media, Lecture notes in computer science, DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) and 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact