M.M. Buslov
Impact in
- Geophysics top 0.2%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Geology top 0.5%
- Geological Studies and Exploration
Papers in
- Geophysics 87
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 87
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 51
- earthquake and tectonic studies 18
-
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping 55
- Co-authors
- Johan De Grave (20 shared papers)Stijn Glorie (15 shared papers)Н.Л. Добрецов (5 shared papers)Keiji Iwata (5 shared papers)Ф.И. Жимулев (16 shared papers)Marlina Elburg (8 shared papers)Inna Safonova (11 shared papers)N. L. Dobretsov (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
M.M. Buslov
88 papers receiving 4.5k citations
M.M. Buslov's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Geophysics 4.3k
- Geology 703
- Geochemistry and Petrology 425
- Artificial Intelligence 2.3k
- Paleontology 426
Countries citing papers authored by M.M. Buslov
This map shows the geographic impact of M.M. Buslov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.M. Buslov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.M. Buslov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.M. Buslov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.M. Buslov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.M. Buslov. The network helps show where M.M. Buslov may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.M. Buslov, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The timing and extent of the eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 407 |
| 2 | 1995 | 321 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 274 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 217 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 210 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 200 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 172 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 155 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 154 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 151 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 149 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 148 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 133 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 95 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 89 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 84 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 83 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 73 |
About M.M. Buslov
M.M. Buslov is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Geology, Mechanics of Materials and Paleontology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (87 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (55 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (51 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (36 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (18 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (6 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (4 papers) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (4.3k citations), Geology (703 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (425 citations), Artificial Intelligence (2.3k citations) and Paleontology (426 citations). M.M. Buslov has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Belgium and China. Frequent co-authors include Johan De Grave, Stijn Glorie, Н.Л. Добрецов, Keiji Iwata, Ф.И. Жимулев, Marlina Elburg, Inna Safonova, N. L. Dobretsov, P. Van den haute and Nikolai A. Berzin. Their work appears in journals such as Russian Geology and Geophysics, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, Gondwana Research, Tectonophysics and Lithos.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.