Mitchell S. Chinn

11 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Mitchell S. Chinn
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Inorganic Chemistry 313
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 50
  • Organic Chemistry 499
  • Pharmaceutical Science 39
  • Catalysis 29
Replace Stephen J. Simpson with:
Stephen J. Simpson United Kingdom
Tina P. Fong Canada
Karlheinz Suenkel Spain
Alan N. Hughes Canada
Ben P. Patel United States
Daniel J. Fox United States
John D. Cotton Australia
Peter J. Desrosiers United States
Lori Stepan Van der Sluys United States
Eleonore Raabe Germany
Mitchell S. Chinn relative to Stephen J. Simpson United Kingdom Stephen J. Simpson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Stephen J. Simpson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell S. Chinn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell S. Chinn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell S. Chinn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell S. Chinn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell S. Chinn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell S. Chinn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell S. Chinn. The network helps show where Mitchell S. Chinn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell S. Chinn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell S. Chinn Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell S. Chinn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1990192
2 1984116
3 198795
4 198991
5 199236
6 198731
7 198730
8 198430
9 19957
10 20245
11 20222

About Mitchell S. Chinn

Mitchell S. Chinn is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Catalysis, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (2 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper) and Analytical chemistry methods development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (313 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (50 citations), Organic Chemistry (499 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (39 citations) and Catalysis (29 citations). Mitchell S. Chinn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Michael Heinekey, Michael P. Doyle, Daan van Leusen, John H. Griffin, C.D. Sofield, Richard Eisenberg, Keith M. DeVries, Jiazhong Chen, Surendra N. Mahapatro and Nancy K. Harn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Chemistry of Materials and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact