Mitchell O. Locks

29 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Mitchell O. Locks
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 356
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 80
  • Statistics and Probability 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 33
  • Control and Systems Engineering 44
Replace Lavon B. Page with:
Lavon B. Page United States
Koichi Inoue Japan
Klaus D. Heidtmann Germany
Sergio B. Guarro United States
Qingyu Yang United States
Anapathur V. Ramesh United States
Leila Meshkat United States
A. Satyanarayana United States
John G. Saw United States
Hanoch Ben-Haim Israel
Mitchell O. Locks relative to Lavon B. Page United States Lavon B. Page's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Lavon B. Page · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell O. Locks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell O. Locks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell O. Locks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell O. Locks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell O. Locks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell O. Locks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell O. Locks. The network helps show where Mitchell O. Locks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell O. Locks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell O. Locks Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell O. Locks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198789
2 196075
3 198546
4 198245
5 197843
6
NEW TABLES OF THE NONCENTRAL T DISTRIBUTION
196336
7 198032
8 197919
9 199219
10 197918
11 197116
12 197813
13 198113
14 198011
15 198411
16 197810
17 19789
18
Monte Carlo Bayesian System Reliability- and MTBF-Confidence Assessment.
19758
19 19798
20 19858

About Mitchell O. Locks

Mitchell O. Locks is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability, Metals and Alloys and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 31 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (20 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (6 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (2 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (2 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Mathematical Control Systems and Analysis (1 paper) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (356 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (80 citations), Statistics and Probability (26 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (33 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (44 citations). Mitchell O. Locks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dean E. Wooldridge, Simon Ramo, J. M. Wilson, A. Satyanarayana and John Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Technometrics, Quality progress and Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact