Mitchell Bush

83 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mitchell Bush
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Small Animals 321
  • Equine 60
  • Parasitology 199
  • Microbiology 142
  • Virology 93
Replace L. Munson with:
L. Munson United States
Dale A. Smith Canada
Randall E. Junge United States
Ramiro Isaza United States
Edward C. Ramsay United States
Graham J. Crawshaw Canada
Scott B. Citino United States
Christine Hawkey United Kingdom
Katherine E. Quesenberry United States
Mark A. Mitchell United States
Mitchell Bush relative to L. Munson United States L. Munson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
L. Munson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Bush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Bush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Bush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Bush. The network helps show where Mitchell Bush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Bush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Bush Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Bush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198699
2 198381
3 197668
4 197666
5 198362
6 198051
7 197844
8 197542
9 199141
10 200735
11 199833
12
CHRONIC CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS IN A BACTRIAN CAMEL (CAMELUS BACTRIANUS)
199130
13 199330
14 197629
15 198128
16 198528
17 198127
18 200027
19 197926
20 198225

About Mitchell Bush

Mitchell Bush is a scholar working on Small Animals, Epidemiology, Microbiology, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (11 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (8 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (7 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (6 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (5 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (321 citations), Equine (60 citations), Parasitology (199 citations), Microbiology (142 citations) and Virology (93 citations). Mitchell Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Montali, Elizabeth Smith, David E. Wildt, J. Andrew Teare, Scott B. Citino, Lyndsay G. Phillips, Stephen J. O’Brien, M. J. G. Appel, James W. Carpenter and A. Everette James. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Investigative Radiology and Skeletal Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact