Ming-Hung Ling
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.1%
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Papers in
-
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery 9
- Advanced Drug Delivery Systems 5
-
- Skin Protection and Aging 1
- Co-authors
- Mei‐Chin Chen (9 shared papers)Zhi-Wei Lin (2 shared papers)Kuan‐Wen Wang (2 shared papers)Dong‐Hwang Chen (2 shared papers)Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Acta Biomaterialia (4 papers)Biomacromolecules (2 papers)ACS Nano (1 paper)Journal of Materials Chemistry B (1 paper)Biomaterials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Taiwan
In The Last Decade
Ming-Hung Ling
9 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Ming-Hung Ling's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Pharmaceutical Science 1.3k
- Dermatology 558
- Insect Science 157
- Immunology 236
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 248
Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Hung Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Hung Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Hung Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Hung Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Hung Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Hung Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Hung Ling. The network helps show where Ming-Hung Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Hung Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Near-Infrared Light-Activatable Microneedle System for Treating Superficial Tumors by Combination of Chemotherapy and Photothermal Therapy Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 324 |
| 2 | 2013 | 254 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 246 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 232 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 132 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 129 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 123 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 55 |
About Ming-Hung Ling
Ming-Hung Ling is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Dermatology, Insect Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (9 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (5 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Skin Protection and Aging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (1.3k citations), Dermatology (558 citations), Insect Science (157 citations), Immunology (236 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (248 citations). Ming-Hung Ling has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Mei‐Chin Chen, Zhi-Wei Lin, Kuan‐Wen Wang, Dong‐Hwang Chen and Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Biomaterialia, Biomacromolecules, ACS Nano, Journal of Materials Chemistry B and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.