Ming-Dar Tsai

604 citations
29 papers · 496 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Dar Tsai

29 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Ming-Dar Tsai
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Neurology 102
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 98
  • Surgery 198
  • Oral Surgery 25
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 12
Replace Robert M. Allman with:
Robert M. Allman United States
Nil Tokgöz Türkiye
Timothy J. Martin United States
R. Filippi Germany
Kerry A. Danelson United States
Austin V. Stone United States
J. P. Chirossel France
Sanjeev Agarwal United Kingdom
Dominik Bürklein Germany
Philippe Bousquet France
Ming-Dar Tsai relative to Robert M. Allman United States Robert M. Allman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Robert M. Allman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Dar Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Dar Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Dar Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Dar Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Dar Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Dar Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Dar Tsai. The network helps show where Ming-Dar Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Dar Tsai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Dar Tsai Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Dar Tsai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199385
2 200165
3 201050
4 200242
5 200830
6 200623
7 199322
8 198922
9 200221
10 199215
11 200613
12 200213
13 201013
14 200211
15 201011
16 200410
17 200410
18 19969
19 20029
20 20086

About Ming-Dar Tsai

Ming-Dar Tsai is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (102 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (98 citations), Surgery (198 citations), Oral Surgery (25 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (12 citations). Ming-Dar Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ming-Shium Hsieh, Tai‐Ngar Lui, Chen-Nen Chang, Tzu-Kang Lin, Sheng‐Jean Huang, Yi–Ju Chen, Wen-Ta Chiu, Mau‐Roung Lin, Wen‐Yu Yu and Shih-Tseng Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Neurosurgery, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact