Ming‐Chia Li

1.1k citations
90 papers · 905 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ming‐Chia Li

82 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Ming‐Chia Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Biomaterials 206
  • Mathematical Physics 113
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 146
  • Organic Chemistry 241
  • Geometry and Topology 63
Replace Wan Zheng with:
Wan Zheng China
Sejong Kim South Korea
Lester C. Barnsley Germany
Yi Qi China
Mingyao Xu China
Maohua Li China
Qiliang Wu China
Richard J. Gaylord United States
Ming‐Chia Li relative to Wan Zheng China Wan Zheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Wan Zheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Chia Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Chia Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Chia Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Chia Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Chia Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Chia Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Chia Li. The network helps show where Ming‐Chia Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Chia Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Chia Li Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Chia Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201793
2 201748
3 201443
4 200738
5 201737
6 202130
7 201128
8 201825
9 201725
10 201724
11 202024
12 201224
13 201123
14 200623
15 200618
16 200717
17 199717
18 199716
19 202315
20 200815

About Ming‐Chia Li

Ming‐Chia Li is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Geometry and Topology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (26 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (17 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (10 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (10 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (10 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (8 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (8 papers) and Economic theories and models (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (206 citations), Mathematical Physics (113 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (146 citations), Organic Chemistry (241 citations) and Geometry and Topology (63 citations). Ming‐Chia Li has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Rong‐Ming Ho, Hsiao‐Fang Wang, Tao Wen, Hung‐Ju Chen, Yu‐Der Lee, Chih‐Min Lin, Chi‐Chuan Wang, Wei‐Tsung Chuang, Yufeng Chen and Ming-Hung Lin. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Macro Letters, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Macromolecules, Langmuir and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact