Ming Du

425 citations
24 papers · 227 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade

Papers in

Ming Du

20 papers receiving 129 citations

Peers

Ming Du
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Anthropology 60
  • Development 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 112
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
Replace William M. Mathew with:
William M. Mathew United Kingdom
James Onley United Kingdom
Linda B. Hall United States
Ruth McVey United Kingdom
William F. Sater United States
Kenneth J. Andrien United States
Ronald P. Toby United States
Tansen Sen United States
Geoff Wade Australia
Eric Tagliacozzo United States
Ming Du relative to William M. Mathew United Kingdom William M. Mathew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
William M. Mathew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Du

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Du's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Du with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Du more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Du

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Du. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Du. The network helps show where Ming Du may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ming Du, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Du Line = papers co-authored together Ming Du links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1956134
2 195631
3 201415
4 20206
5 20166
6 20184
7 20114
8 20153
9 20163
10 20103
11 20213
12 20222
13 20252
14 20152
15 20232
16 20101
17 20151
18 20121
19 20201
20 19641

About Ming Du

Ming Du is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Law, having authored 24 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include World Trade Organization Law (14 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (11 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (6 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (3 papers), EU Law and Policy Analysis (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers) and Law, logistics, and international trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (60 citations), Development (11 citations), Political Science and International Relations (63 citations), Sociology and Political Science (112 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations). Ming Du has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yun Zhang, Shen Wei and Richard K. Beardsley. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Journal of International Economic Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Journal of World Trade and German Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact