Ming Ding

147 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Ming Ding's Hit Papers

Are we really making much progress? 2021 · 161 citations
1610+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Ming Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 141
  • Sensory Systems 124
  • Rehabilitation 159
  • Control and Systems Engineering 604
  • Artificial Intelligence 798
Replace George K. I. Mann with:
George K. I. Mann Canada
G.S. Virk United Kingdom
Quan Liu China
Muhammad Majid Pakistan
Bilal Khan Pakistan
Samia Nefti‐Meziani United Kingdom
Juvenal Rodríguez‐Reséndiz Mexico
R. Janarthanan India
Gabriel Villarrubia González Spain
Wenbing Zhao United States
Ming Ding relative to George K. I. Mann Canada George K. I. Mann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
George K. I. Mann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Ding. The network helps show where Ming Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ming Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Are we really making much progress?
Hit paper breakdown →
2021161
2 2011157
3 2019149
4 2019119
5 2020117
6 2010100
7 2010100
8 202288
9 199886
10 199974
11 200863
12 202258
13 201150
14 202140
15 201735
16 200934
17 202332
18 201531
19 200630
20 201829

About Ming Ding

Ming Ding is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology and Rehabilitation, having authored 162 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (32 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (27 papers), Power Systems and Renewable Energy (22 papers), Microgrid Control and Optimization (21 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (21 papers), Smart Grid and Power Systems (15 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (13 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (141 citations), Sensory Systems (124 citations), Rehabilitation (159 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (604 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (798 citations). Ming Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tsukasa Ogasawara, Jie Tang, Rui Bi, Jun Ueda, Robert F. Margolskee, Hongxia Yang, Yuxiao Dong, Chang Zhou, Jun Takamatsu and Luis Ruíz-Ávila. Their work appears in journals such as Dianli xitong zidonghua, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Solar Energy, IEEE Access and Energies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact