Michaela Memm

583 citations
13 papers · 495 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michaela Memm

13 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Michaela Memm
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Automotive Engineering 360
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 455
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 53
  • Mechanical Engineering 68
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 9
Replace Kyeong‐Min Jeong with:
Kyeong‐Min Jeong South Korea
Liqin Yan China
Sebastian Reuber Germany
Lipeng Xu China
Markus Hölzle Germany
Alison R. Dunlop United States
Yoon Koo Lee South Korea
Min Ji Namkoong United States
Ludwig Kraft Germany
Kazuma Kumai Japan
Michaela Memm relative to Kyeong‐Min Jeong South Korea Kyeong‐Min Jeong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kyeong‐Min Jeong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Memm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Memm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Memm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Memm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Memm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Memm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Memm. The network helps show where Michaela Memm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Memm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Memm Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Memm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2019162
2 2019110
3 201768
4 201734
5 201931
6 201431
7 202021
8 201813
9 20208
10 20188
11 20235
12 20143
13 20251

About Michaela Memm

Michaela Memm is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Battery Materials (13 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (12 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (11 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (2 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (360 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (455 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (53 citations), Mechanical Engineering (68 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (9 citations). Michaela Memm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Margret Wohlfahrt‐Mehrens, Rares‐George Scurtu, Verena Müller, Michael A. Danzer, Thomas Waldmann, Karsten Richter, Fabian Jeschull, Daniel Brandell, Peter Axmann and Alice Hoffmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Journal of Power Sources, Energy Technology, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and ACS Applied Energy Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact