Michael W. Dix

505 citations
11 papers · 423 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael W. Dix

8 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Michael W. Dix
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 329
  • Insect Science 159
  • Genetics 296
  • Ecology 70
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 29
Replace Donald W. Pyle with:
Donald W. Pyle United States
Gary Dodson United States
Ingrid de la Motte Germany
Kathryn B. McNamara Australia
Christian Salcedo China
Igor Emelianov United Kingdom
Nikolai J. Tatarnic Australia
Vikram K. Iyengar United States
Viterbo Rodríguez Panama
James Rapkin United Kingdom
Michael W. Dix relative to Donald W. Pyle United States Donald W. Pyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Donald W. Pyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Dix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Dix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Dix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Dix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Dix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Dix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Dix. The network helps show where Michael W. Dix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael W. Dix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael W. Dix Line = papers co-authored together Michael W. Dix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1979265
2 197046
3
Sex ratios in some common British wintering ducks
198637
4 196822
5 196922
6 200014
7 197013
8
Mal de Viñas del café: ¿biótico o abiótico?l
19962
9 20151
10 20161
11 20220

About Michael W. Dix

Michael W. Dix is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (2 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (2 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (329 citations), Insect Science (159 citations), Genetics (296 citations), Ecology (70 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (29 citations). Michael W. Dix has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Guatemala and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ross H. Crozier, Myrfyn Owen, Nancy Clark, Peter K.T. Pang, Margaret Dix, Kenneth M. Cameron and Helda Morales. Their work appears in journals such as Science, General and Comparative Endocrinology, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Lankesteriana and Brittonia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact