Michael Troxel
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 1%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 144
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 88
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 42
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 26
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology 24
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 77
- Co-authors
- Mustapha Ishak (12 shared papers)Niall MacCrann (2 shared papers)Xiao Fang (2 shared papers)Jonathan Blazek (1 shared paper)J. Parrent (4 shared papers)David Branch (4 shared papers)Edward Baron (4 shared papers)David J. Jeffery (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (85 papers)Physical review. D (43 papers)Physical Review Letters (5 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (5 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Troxel
178 papers receiving 13.1k citations
Michael Troxel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Instrumentation 3.2k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 12.4k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4.0k
- Oceanography 416
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 426
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Troxel
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Troxel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Troxel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Troxel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Troxel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Troxel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Troxel. The network helps show where Michael Troxel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Troxel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 911 |
| 2 | A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 894 |
| 3 | Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 866 |
| 4 | The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 683 |
| 5 | Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 484 |
| 6 | The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1 Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 459 |
| 7 | The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Discovery of the Optical Counterpart Using the Dark Energy Camera Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 388 |
| 8 | Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 350 |
| 9 | The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 324 |
| 10 | Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 310 |
| 11 | 2018 | 215 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 209 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 206 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 205 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 195 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 172 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 167 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 166 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 163 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 161 |
About Michael Troxel
Michael Troxel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 183 papers that have together received 13.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (144 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (88 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (77 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (42 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (26 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (24 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (23 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (3.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (12.4k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (4.0k citations), Oceanography (416 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (426 citations). Michael Troxel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mustapha Ishak, Niall MacCrann, Xiao Fang, Jonathan Blazek, J. Parrent, David Branch, Edward Baron, David J. Jeffery, Austin Peel and NICHOLAS R.S. HALL. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.