Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky

467 citations
18 papers · 250 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky

15 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 174
  • Development 19
  • Strategy and Management 66
  • Law 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
Replace John E. Kersell with:
John E. Kersell Canada
Per Torsvik Norway
Ralph M. Goldman United States
Abby Innes United Kingdom
Jozef Bátora Slovakia
Shale Horowitz United States
David Coombes Ireland
Martin Brusis Germany
Lisbeth Aggestam Sweden
Cindy Skach United States
Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky relative to John E. Kersell Canada John E. Kersell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John E. Kersell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky. The network helps show where Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2002114
2 199154
3 199926
4 198910
5
Christlich-demokratische und konservative Parteien in Westeuropa
19839
6 19997
7 19726
8
Send the rascals packing
19984
9 19894
10 20164
11 19694
12 19772
13 19892
14 20111
15 19911
16 19731
17
Voter registration in England and Wales : problems and solutions
19871
18
Power to the centre
19980

About Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky

Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Political Systems and Governance (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (174 citations), Development (19 citations), Strategy and Management (66 citations), Law (28 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (91 citations). Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Anton Pelinka, Mark Philp, E. J. Feuchtwanger and Iain McLean. Their work appears in journals such as Representation, Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research, Journal of democracy, Political Studies and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact